<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO for Dynamic URLs &#8211; Should you rewrite them to SEO friendly format ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/</link>
	<description>Things of interest to the average internet savvy guy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO friendly URLs: myth and fact &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-10180</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO friendly URLs: myth and fact &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-10180</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-for... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] <a  href="http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-for.." rel="nofollow">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-for..</a>. [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5632</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5632</guid>
		<description>exactly...all that the article did was to create unnecessary confusions.Just ignore the bad article acknowledged even by Matt..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->exactly&#8230;all that the article did was to create unnecessary confusions.Just ignore the bad article acknowledged even by Matt..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srijith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5621</link>
		<dc:creator>Srijith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5621</guid>
		<description>&quot; For example, if you&#039;re searching for information about aviation, a URL like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation will help you decide whether to click that link. A URL like http://www.example.com/index.php?id_sezione=360&amp;sid=3a5ebc944f41daa6f849f730f1, is much less appealing to users. &quot;

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76329&amp;hl=en

So now I am really confused!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8221; For example, if you&#8217;re searching for information about aviation, a URL like <a  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation</a> will help you decide whether to click that link. A URL like <a  href="http://www.example.com/index.php?id_sezione=360&#038;sid=3a5ebc944f41daa6f849f730f1" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com/index.php?id_sezione=360&amp;sid=3a5ebc944f41daa6f849f730f1</a>, is much less appealing to users. &#8221;</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76329&#038;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=76329&amp;hl=en</a></p>
<p>So now I am really confused!!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mani Karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mani Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5616</guid>
		<description>@ Rajesh and Sree

I think we should continue with the way URL&#039;s were optimized for WP blogs. However, if Google can sieve it&#039;s way through nonsensical URLs for shopping carts and dynamic content sites, that&#039;s a glorious improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ Rajesh and Sree</p>
<p>I think we should continue with the way URL&#8217;s were optimized for WP blogs. However, if Google can sieve it&#8217;s way through nonsensical URLs for shopping carts and dynamic content sites, that&#8217;s a glorious improvement.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5615</guid>
		<description>that was one bad article from google and Matt himself was embarassed...

all they intended to tell was to that they do crawl &quot;Parameterized&quot; URLs well now...

but it does not mean that one need to get away from SE friendly pretty permalinks...if you can do it the right way...CMS like wordpress does it fine and we never had problemes until now...

Infact the definitions of Static and dynamic URLs were wrong in that google post...very embarassing stuff for Matt and google indeed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->that was one bad article from google and Matt himself was embarassed&#8230;</p>
<p>all they intended to tell was to that they do crawl &#8220;Parameterized&#8221; URLs well now&#8230;</p>
<p>but it does not mean that one need to get away from SE friendly pretty permalinks&#8230;if you can do it the right way&#8230;CMS like wordpress does it fine and we never had problemes until now&#8230;</p>
<p>Infact the definitions of Static and dynamic URLs were wrong in that google post&#8230;very embarassing stuff for Matt and google indeed&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiran</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5614</guid>
		<description>Good Info ....Thanks to Google Again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Good Info &#8230;.Thanks to Google Again<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Önder</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>Önder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>i think there is no need to rewrite dynamic  urls again. because first of all if i think about my web site: i created it nearly 2 years ago and i learn seo just the beginning of summer and i used it in my web site and it works good. now my dynamic urls 
are nearly at the top of the google when you search most of the keywords. 

but i learn that: seo friendly urls are the best but if google index your urls nearly one year ago i think you must touch them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->i think there is no need to rewrite dynamic  urls again. because first of all if i think about my web site: i created it nearly 2 years ago and i learn seo just the beginning of summer and i used it in my web site and it works good. now my dynamic urls<br />
are nearly at the top of the google when you search most of the keywords. </p>
<p>but i learn that: seo friendly urls are the best but if google index your urls nearly one year ago i think you must touch them.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinu</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>dinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>hope we will get less tickets asking for .htaccess help for this LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->hope we will get less tickets asking for .htaccess help for this LOL<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sree Pillai</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5606</link>
		<dc:creator>Sree Pillai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5606</guid>
		<description>Here is my take on this.
http://www.teck.in/static-and-dynamic-urls-should-i-rewrite-dynamic-url.html

Static-looking URLs are user friendly, and works on other search engines too.

My suggestion is to continue using the static-like URLs for dynamic websites such as WordPress, BBPress, Joomla, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Here is my take on this.<br />
<a  href="http://www.teck.in/static-and-dynamic-urls-should-i-rewrite-dynamic-url.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.teck.in/static-and-dynamic-urls-should-i-rewrite-dynamic-url.html</a></p>
<p>Static-looking URLs are user friendly, and works on other search engines too.</p>
<p>My suggestion is to continue using the static-like URLs for dynamic websites such as WordPress, BBPress, Joomla, etc..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.dailybloggr.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyseoblog.com/2008/09/seo-for-dynamic-urls-should-you-rewrite-them-to-seo-friendly-format/#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>Great revolution, Google brings us good news, :) Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Great revolution, Google brings us good news, <img src='http://www.dailybloggr.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks for sharing!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
